The keyboardist count is capped at one, so split on it; the strictly-more-guitarists-than-drummers and at-least-one-drummer conditions then fix the allowed splits.
Zero keyboardists: the 5 members come from guitarists and drummers with more guitarists than drummers and at least one drummer. The only splits are 4 guitarists with 1 drummer, C(5,4) × C(4,1) = 5 × 4 = 20, and 3 guitarists with 2 drummers, C(5,3) × C(4,2) = 10 × 6 = 60. That case totals 80.
Exactly one keyboardist: choose the keyboardist in C(3,1) = 3 ways, then fill 4 seats from guitarists and drummers under the same conditions. The only valid split is 3 guitarists with 1 drummer, since a 4-and-0 split has no drummer and a 2-and-2 split is not strictly more: C(5,3) × C(4,1) = 10 × 4 = 40, × 3 = 120.
Total: 80 + 120 = 200. So the answer is D.
Three interacting constraints mean no single combination works, so the count must be assembled case by case. A (80) keeps only the no-keyboardist case. B (120) reads at most one as exactly one and keeps only that case. C (180) drops the 4-guitarists-1-drummer lineups. E (320) ignores the keyboardist cap and allows any number.