QuantProblem Solving

Free GMAT Problem Solving Practice Question

PrepLattice is an independent test-preparation service and is not affiliated with or endorsed by GMAC, the organization that administers the GMAT. GMAT and GMAT Focus are trademarks of GMAC, used here only to name the exam this question is designed to prepare you for.

A roaster's blends P and Q are each made only from Arabica beans and Robusta beans. A batch of 10 pounds of blend P and 30 pounds of blend Q is 40 percent Arabica by weight, and a batch of 30 pounds of P and 10 pounds of Q is 60 percent Arabica by weight. What percent, by weight, of a batch made from 24 pounds of P and 16 pounds of Q is Arabica?

Five fresh questions every day, your progress tracked, every miss explained. Free with an account.

Answer & Explanation

Correct answer

C

No per-blend Arabica fractions are given, so treat the Arabica fraction of P and of Q as unknowns and read the two given batches as two equations. Let p be the Arabica fraction of blend P and q the Arabica fraction of blend Q. Batch 1 (10 lb P, 30 lb Q, 40 lb total, 40 percent Arabica): 10p + 30q = 16, so p + 3q = 1.6. Batch 2 (30 lb P, 10 lb Q, 40 lb total, 60 percent Arabica): 30p + 10q = 24, so 3p + q = 2.4. Subtracting the first from the second gives 2p - 2q = 0.8, so p minus q = 0.4. Adding the two original equations gives 4p + 4q = 4, so p + q = 1. Therefore p = 0.7 and q = 0.3: blend P is 70 percent Arabica and blend Q is 30 percent.

For the new batch (24 lb P, 16 lb Q, 40 lb total), the Arabica weight is 24 × 0.7 + 16 × 0.3 = 16.8 + 4.8 = 21.6 pounds, which is 21.6 ÷ 40 = 54 percent. So the answer is C.

Among the traps: B (50 percent) takes the quick p + q = 1 and reports the midpoint, but the midpoint holds only for a 1-to-1 mix; the new batch is 3-to-2, weighting P more, so it must exceed 50 percent. E (60 percent) reuses Batch 2's figure, but the new 3-to-2 ratio matches neither given batch. A (46 percent) assigns each blend the other's Arabica fraction, a variable-swap slip. D (56 percent) sets up correctly but slips in the final addition, reading 16.8 + 4.8 as 22.4 rather than 21.6.