Translate each condition into a linear inequality, then combine them. Condition 1: four more than twice the number of pallets is at most 30, so 2n + 4 ≤ 30. Subtract 4: 2n ≤ 26. Divide by 2: n ≤ 13. Condition 2: subtract n from 5, multiply by 3, and the product is less than negative 9, so 3(5 − n) < −9. Expand: 15 − 3n < −9. Subtract 15: −3n < −24. Now divide both sides by −3, and because you are dividing by a negative number you must reverse the inequality sign: n > 8.
Combine the two results: 8 < n ≤ 13. Since n must be a whole number of pallets, the possible values are 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13, which is 5 values. The credited answer is (C) 5.
Why each wrong choice is a tempting slip: (E) 7 is the classic error of not flipping the sign when dividing by negative 3, which turns n > 8 into n < 8 and yields the values 1 through 7. (D) 6 comes from flipping correctly but treating the lower boundary as included (n at least 8 instead of n greater than 8), which wrongly adds 8 to the list. (B) 4 comes from flipping correctly but reading the at-most condition as a strict less-than, which wrongly drops the value 13. (A) 3 comes from dropping the top value 13 by reading at most as a strict less-than, and also losing the value 9 by starting the count at 10, an extra off-by-one at the low end, leaving only 10, 11, and 12. Each distractor isolates a single, common reasoning error: a missed sign reversal, an included boundary, an excluded boundary, or a miscount at the ends of the range.