VerbalReading Comprehension

Free GMAT Reading Comprehension Practice Question

PrepLattice is an independent test-preparation service and is not affiliated with or endorsed by GMAC, the organization that administers the GMAT. GMAT and GMAT Focus are trademarks of GMAC, used here only to name the exam this question is designed to prepare you for.

When a star much heavier than the Sun exhausts its nuclear fuel, its core collapses and the outer layers rebound in a supernova. For decades, astronomers assumed that such explosions distribute newly forged heavy elements evenly through the surrounding gas, like dye stirred into water. Recent radio surveys of expanding supernova remnants complicate that picture. The surveys reveal that elements such as iron and nickel are not spread smoothly but are concentrated in dense clumps and narrow filaments, with large pockets of gas left nearly untouched.

The leading explanation attributes this unevenness to instabilities that arise during the collapse itself. As the rebounding shock wave pushes outward, slight irregularities in pressure grow rapidly, fracturing the once-smooth shell into fingers of enriched material. Because these fingers travel at different speeds, the heavy elements they carry are deposited at varying distances from the original star.

The finding matters for understanding how later generations of stars and planets form. If enrichment is patchy rather than uniform, then two young stars condensing only a few light-years apart from the same remnant could inherit markedly different chemical compositions. Some researchers now suspect that this variability, long treated as measurement noise, may instead carry a genuine record of the explosions that preceded each star's birth.

The passage suggests that two young stars condensing close together from the same remnant could differ in composition primarily because

Five fresh questions every day, your progress tracked, every miss explained. Free with an account.

Answer & Explanation

Correct answer

A

Inference. Paragraph two states that fingers of enriched material move at different speeds and deposit elements at varying distances; paragraph three ties this uneven deposition to the differing compositions of nearby stars, so (A) is supported.

(B) violates the shared-remnant premise the stem fixes. (C) reintroduces the measurement-noise reading the author moves away from. (D) imports a plausible fact the passage never states and that, even if true, would not explain why two stars from one remnant differ. (E) reverses the shock wave's role: it amplifies irregularities rather than smoothing them.