The combined completion rate is not the simple average of the five rates; it has to be weighted by enrollment.
Statement 1 - Yes. The simple average of the five completion rates is (60 + 50 + 80 + 70 + 75) ÷ 5 = 67%. The rate across all students combined weights each school by its enrollment: (400 × 60 + 1,200 × 50 + 300 × 80 + 600 × 70 + 500 × 75) ÷ 3,000 = 187,500 ÷ 3,000 = 62.5%. The combined rate is lower, so the statement is true. The reason is that the largest school, Brightline with 1,200 students, has the lowest completion rate at 50%, so it dominates the pooled rate and pulls it below the simple mean. The trap is to average the five rates and stop.
Statement 2 - No. Students per instructor is enrollment divided by instructors: Forgepoint 16.0, Brightline 15.0, Sterling 15.0, Hawthorne 15.0, Vantage 20.0. The largest school is Brightline at 15.0 students per instructor, which is tied for the lowest; the most students per instructor is Vantage at 20.0, a much smaller school with 500 students. So the largest school is not the most crowded per instructor, and the statement is false. The trap is to assume the biggest school must have the most students per instructor.
Statement 3 - No. The highest completion rate is Sterling at 80%, but the highest placement rate is Vantage at 88%; Sterling's placement is 78%, the lowest of the five. The two leaders are different schools, so the statement is false. The trap is the halo assumption that the school best at finishing students is also best at placing them.
The lesson: a combined rate is weighted by size, a per-instructor figure can invert the enrollment ranking, and one school need not lead on two rates at once. Correct answers: Yes / No / No.